Harald-Schirmer.de

Mit Neugier, Respekt & Mut gemeinsam Zukunft gestalten

Collaborative writing – appreciation and lessons learned

Update-Datum:

I am officially flashed!

In the spirit of social collaboration, I asked my network to review, extend, criticize and challenge my draft for an article. Before I will consolidate the great input to one fluent document I would like to say a big THANKYOU to all the thoughts and work, which the contributors shared.

etherpad

https://haraldschirmer.titanpad.com/3 (Service leider nicht mehr verfügbar)

By the way I am really questioning myself, if my consolidation is the best way to value the great input, or if going back to a single author article is not a fall-back?

I want to share my learnings of former, similar experiments and my experience of this public one – after showing you the hero’s of my network: (and believe me – group editing of a long text is not just fun“)

3f37e65
Guido Bosbach
308e4a0
Frank Edelkraut
28591e6
Winfried Felser
0f92abb
Bernd Gewehr
AAEAAQAAAAAAAAVRAAAAJDAzMTYyMjcyLTFjMWYtNGNiOS1hNWE0LTZhMGY1ZGU1ODY4OA
Lukas Fütterer
09271a6
Frank Kleinert
326cf70
Joachim Niemeier
AAEAAQAAAAAAAAX4AAAAJDYyMzVjYWIxLTlmMGYtNDVlOS1iNTFmLWM0ZTdmNmM1ZmY5ZQ
Franz-Peter Staudt
AAEAAQAAAAAAAAKpAAAAJGVlZjE4NzY4LTVjZDYtNDg3Yy1iZjdjLTAyZGFjMGI4ZTQxMg
Florian Junge
AAEAAQAAAAAAAAjEAAAAJDZkNTJiODFkLTVjZWYtNGYxMC1hNGVhLTU4NDBkMmU0NTEwNA
Enno Pieperjohanns
AAEAAQAAAAAAAAY7AAAAJDA0NTMyMmMzLTZkMjAtNDc2NC05MmJkLWM1YTU0NTU5N2E3OQ
Ragnar Heil
AAEAAQAAAAAAAARjAAAAJDA1YjY4YTEwLTBlMGUtNGZlNS1iYmZmLTVmMGM3ZDAwNzgyMg
Katharina Krentz
yh9n4ie0y1qcq837aks9_400x400
Samuel Treiber
AAEAAQAAAAAAAAPnAAAAJDdhN2IyODJjLTkwZGYtNDE3ZS1iYTlhLTkwZDU3MzdiNzY5OQ
Kerstin Schinck
AAEAAQAAAAAAAAbyAAAAJGQ3OTRmMmI2LTMxN2EtNDQ0Yy1iZGE4LThkNGRiNzdhYjJjMQ
Roland Panter
AAEAAQAAAAAAAARMAAAAJGFiNjI0MGZjLWY3OTQtNGNmMS04NTFkLTUwM2E2ZDY3NGU5Yw
Ursula Vranken
AAEAAQAAAAAAAAcQAAAAJDU3ZjEzM2IzLTBmZDUtNGE3OC05NmMyLThjYWE1NDk1YjY3Yg
Matthias Lorentz
Paul Feldhaus

+ 4 anonymous

It is not very common, to write an article with multiple authors (22). Here are some lessons I learned so far:

authors

There are various types of contributions within the collaborative document to expect:

  • spelling and grammar (English is not my native language 😉
  • smaller additions, fragments
  • bigger  parts, new sentences even complete blocks
  • questions which enrich the text (and could remain)
  • questions to the author or the others (asking for opinion, permission…)
  • comments (to be published or to give additional hints)
  • discussions (I agree with…)
  • appreciation or expressing agreement or denial
  • short thought journeys (could be this, or maybe that…)
  • links to valuable sources
  • advice to do things different

There are additional sources to keep an eye on:

  • I received eMails with additional information, thoughts and feedback
  • We had parallel discussions on Facebook and various Messengers
  • We shared experience on video-calls and via phone

ensure enough time for the network – my first invitation was for 1 week, the reminder was sent 2 days before end (weekend is not a good idea – family time!)
as in all collaborative projects, expect the most activity right after publishing and at or even after the deadline 😉
Diversity means not only a variety of thoughts and input:

  • There are different expectations on a „good“ storyline (visionary, strategy, pragmatic, philosophic, general, specific)
  • Same is for the writing style (scientific, personal, generic, advising, reviewing, promoting, explaining…)

What’s the goal of the collaborative article?

  • Creating a multi-perspective knowledge consolidation
  • Displaying the collaborative work style
  • Offering a complex but rich reading experience (which might be hard to read)
  • Strengthening networks, promoting experts, demonstrating „it works“ or just showing off

Don’t just delegate work – the list part in my article had the option to be enriched with links and explanations
Expect promotion of own content, websites, articles, products, services (it did not really happen here and it is not always bad)
Etherpad is not helpful for bigger groups (see some screenshots at the end) – next time I try Google Docs

  • coloring is very limited – more than 5 contributors are hard to distinguish
  • I have no idea to find out who wrote what (if I could change the colors of the authors would help a lot, or a mouse over, who is behind the color, once you scroll down)
  • The authors are only visible in the time slider mode, which takes forever to load
  • the sidebar did not work at all – chatting was never used, since there was no indication of anyone being „online“
cocreative writing

stay tuned for the article…

2 Antworten zu „Collaborative writing – appreciation and lessons learned“

  1. […] Collaborative writing – appreciation and lessons learned […]

  2. […] Du hast kürzlich über Dein Blog ein kollaboratives Projekt gestartet – wo Du mit Mitstreitern versucht hast, die Frage “Worum […]

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert